Tweak

InsaneJournal

Tweak says, "Is there fanfic about Tweak?"

Username: 
Password:    
Remember Me
  • Create Account
  • IJ Login
  • OpenID Login
Search by : 
  • View
    • Create Account
    • IJ Login
    • OpenID Login
  • Journal
    • Post
    • Edit Entries
    • Customize Journal
    • Comment Settings
    • Recent Comments
    • Manage Tags
  • Account
    • Manage Account
    • Viewing Options
    • Manage Profile
    • Manage Notifications
    • Manage Pictures
    • Manage Schools
    • Account Status
  • Friends
    • Edit Friends
    • Edit Custom Groups
    • Friends Filter
    • Nudge Friends
    • Invite
    • Create RSS Feed
  • Asylums
    • Post
    • Asylum Invitations
    • Manage Asylums
    • Create Asylum
  • Site
    • Support
    • Upgrade Account
    • FAQs
    • Search By Location
    • Search By Interest
    • Search Randomly

AngiePen ([info]angiepen) wrote,
@ 2009-10-16 04:29:00

Previous Entry  Add to memories!  Tell a Friend!  Next Entry
Is YOUR Senator Pro-Gang-Rape?
Yeah, that's pretty inflamatory. I'm feeling pretty damn inflamed right now, so I think that's appropriate.

In 2005, Jamie Leigh Jones, a twenty-year-old employee of KBR -- at the time a subsidiary of Halliburton, and hey look, they're hiring -- was working in Iraq. Her co-workers drugged her, gang-raped her, abused her so badly her breasts were disfigured permanently, then locked her in a shipping container for twenty-four hours without food or water. She was told by her employer that if she left Iraq to get medical attention, she'd be fired.

According to an ABC News post:

Jones says, she convinced a sympathetic guard to loan her a cell phone so she could call her father in Texas.

"I said, 'Dad, I've been raped. I don't know what to do. I'm in this container, and I'm not able to leave,'" she said. Her father called their congressman, Rep. Ted Poe, R-Texas.

"We contacted the State Department first," Poe told ABCNews.com, "and told them of the urgency of rescuing an American citizen" -- from her American employer.

Poe says his office contacted the State Department, which quickly dispatched agents from the U.S. Embassy in Baghdad to Jones' camp, where they rescued her from the container.


Also:

Jones told ABCNews.com that an examination by Army doctors showed she had been raped "both vaginally and anally," but that the rape kit disappeared after it was handed over to KBR security officers.

Wow, what a shocking misfortune.

Her assailants were never brought to trial, either, neither criminally nor civilly. Why? Because Ms. Jones's employment contract with KBR states that a victim of sexual assault surrenders the right to prosecute their rapists; all such matters must be taken before a private arbitrator, where there's no transcript kept and the proceedings are not public record.

And this is by no means an isolated incident. See the links below for more cases, more women who've been raped and brutalized and threatened while working abroad for defense contractors, coming forward.

So essentially, if you work for one of these companies overseas, your co-workers can gang rape you, leaving you permanently injured, the company you work for can threaten you with the loss of your job if you try to go home for medical help, their security people will "lose" key evidence of the crime against you, and your only recourse is private arbitration. Your assailants will never see prison time, and there'll be no official record of what happened.

Or rather, this was the case until last Tuesday. According to a story in MinnPost.com:

In one of the most public tests of his political skills since taking office in July, Sen. Al Franken pushed through an amendment Tuesday that would withhold defense contracts from companies like Halliburton if they restrict their employees from taking workplace sexual assault, battery and discrimination cases to court.

So essentially, if a company tries to create an atmosphere encouraging rape and assault among their employees by preventing victims from seeking prosecution, they're cut off from defense contracts. That's kind of minimal, but since the only thing these people understand is money, it might just work. Note also that the author of the amendment has only been on the job for three months -- way to go, Senator Franken!

But now we get to the part which is relevant to the title of this post. One would think that every person with two brain cells to rub together for mutual warmth would be in favor of this change, but unfortunately that's not the case. Thirty senators -- all Republican, coincidentally I'm sure -- voted against the amendment. Is your senator among them? If so, please write or call and tell them what you think of how they voted.

There's a complete list of how everyone voted on the U.S. Senate web site. This is official, a dot-gov web site; it's not some unofficial nose-count by a partisan press. Is your senator on the "Nay" list?

Also, props to the ten Republican senators who voted for the amendment:

Bennett (R-UT), Collins (R-ME), Grassley (R-IA), Hatch (R-UT), Hutchison (R-TX), LeMieux (R-FL), Lugar (R-IN), Murkowski (R-AK), Snowe (R-ME), and Voinovich (R-OH).

It's pretty sad that voting in favor of punishing gang-rape is something worth particular praise, but still, I applaud these senators for voting for what's right, rather than going along with the Boys-Will-Be-Boys Club.

Thanks to a friend of mine on LJ for giving me a heads-up to this.

More sources:

Celluloid Blonde
Firedog Lake -- Ms. Jones says eleven more women have contacted her about similar incidents
Huffington Post
The Minnesota Independent
The Nation -- and another KBR rape case.
Politico
Think Progress -- this one has an embedded video of Sen. Franken's speech.
Think Progress -- this one talks about three other women who've come forward

Angie


(Post a new comment)


[info]yonmei
2009-10-16 11:48 am UTC (link)
Okay if I retweet this? Because this is pretty damned outrageous. A law that says the victim of a crime has a right to legal redress is a pretty damn basic thing for someone to support - that thirty Republican Senators fail that pretty damn basic test...

Sixteen Democratic Senators voted against DOMA.

(Reply to this) (Thread)


[info]angiepen
2009-10-16 11:59 am UTC (link)
Please do. This needs to be spread around, and those senators who voted against the amendment need to hear from their constituents.

Angie

(Reply to this) (Parent) (Thread)


[info]yonmei
2009-10-16 12:14 pm UTC (link)
I had a few goes at reducing it to 140 characters, will have another go later. :-(

(Reply to this) (Parent) (Thread)


[info]angiepen
2009-10-16 12:16 pm UTC (link)
I'm not on Twitter so I can't really help, but could you do, like, a series of 140-char twitters? [squint]

Or heck, just the title of this post with a link? It should attract some attention, anyway. [cough]

Angie

(Reply to this) (Parent) (Thread)


[info]yonmei
2009-10-16 12:46 pm UTC (link)
One of the ways Twitter works best is if there's a keyword that keeps getting repeated - but trying to figure out what this one should be...

Hm. Maybe I should do it with the 30 Senator names...

(Reply to this) (Parent) (Thread)


[info]angiepen
2009-10-16 01:08 pm UTC (link)
Ahh, I see. I guess I'm just better off working with more verbal elbow room. And I'm having a hard time thinking of a single keyword too. [ponder]

Angie

(Reply to this) (Parent)


[info]stewardess
2009-10-16 05:27 pm UTC (link)
Defense contractors such as Blackwater were given immunity for all crimes, giving them the same status as UN personnel and diplomats. That immunity has been under attack from the very beginning of the war, but it gained momentum in September, 2007, when defense contractors killed 14 unarmed Iraqi citizens in Baghdad. In October, 2007, the U.S. House passed a bill that made "all private contractors working in Iraq and other combat zones subject to the Military Extraterritorial Jurisdiction Act and thus prosecution by U.S. courts." So Franken's amendment shouldn't have been necessary -- if the October, 2007, bill is being enforced, that is.

(Reply to this) (Thread)


[info]angiepen
2009-10-16 05:38 pm UTC (link)
Assuming it's being enforced. [nod] It seems not. Or maybe there's some other verbage in the '07 bill limiting it to crimes committed against foreign nationals, or something like that?

Angie

(Reply to this) (Parent) (Thread)


[info]stewardess
2009-10-16 11:08 pm UTC (link)
Not sure about foreign nationals. Since there is a multi-national UN force in Iraq, as well as thousands of non-U.S. contractors (especially from the UK), it would have been a huge oversight if the 2007 bill addressed only the rights of Iraqis. But the 2007 bill didn't address contractor employees being asked to surrender the right to prosecute, so Franken's bill may have been necessary for that reason.

(Reply to this) (Parent)



Home | Site Map | Manage Account | TOS | Privacy | Support | FAQs